January 25, 2011

Israeli Hasbara is a Joke ! - Melanie Phillips

Melanie says it to Israel TV just the way it is....

Labels: ,

January 20, 2011

Dermer's got kishkes

A Response from the Office of Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu

By Ron Dermer, Senior Advisor to the Israeli Prime Minister
Tuesday, Jan. 18, 2011

Dear Mr. Stengel,

I wanted to bring to your attention a recent article in Time entitled "Israel's Rightward Lurch Scares Some Conservatives." I hope that you will agree that the article's obvious bias and numerous distortions are not worthy of the standards of your prestigious magazine.

Israel is depicted in the article as essentially sliding towards fascism. Your correspondent refers to Israel's Shin Bet (the equivalent of the FBI) as a "secret police," claims that the Israeli government "increasingly equates dissent with disloyalty," and accuses the Prime Minister of "taking a page from neighboring authoritarian states."

The evidence offered for these outrageous allegations includes a preliminary vote in our parliament that would require naturalized citizens to make a pledge of allegiance, a proposal to strip citizenship from Israelis convicted of espionage and terrorism, a motion to investigate foreign government funding of local NGOs, calls on Jews to not rent property to Arabs, and demonstrations demanding prohibitions of Arab boys from dating Jewish girls.

But your correspondent did not find it necessary to inform your readers of a few facts.

Oaths of allegiance are commonplace in most democratic countries, including the United States. Naturalized citizens in America swear an oath to its Constitution and to defend the country against "all enemies, foreign and domestic." Israel's proposed pledge would require naturalized citizens to swear an oath to Israel as a Jewish and democratic state, words taken directly from our Declaration of Independence.

Moreover, Great Britain, France, Germany, and Italy are just some of the many countries where citizenship can be stripped for various infractions that are defined as undermining "national interests." Are these European countries not democratic?

In the United States, Senator Joe Leiberman proposed a bill last year to "add joining a foreign terrorist organization or engaging in or supporting hostilities against the United States or its allies to the list of acts for which United States nationals would lose their nationality." Is American democracy threatened by such a bill?

As for questioning the legitimacy of foreign government funding of Israeli NGOs, mentioning America's Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) may have presented a more balanced picture.

FARA requires that any organization engaged in lobbying in the U.S. that receives money from foreign individuals, let alone foreign governments, must among other things register as a foreign agent with the Department of Justice and permit the Attorney General to inspect all of its activities.

It is hard to imagine any democratic country accepting foreign governments intervening in its domestic affairs by funding domestic groups engaged not merely in criticism of a particular government's policy but also attacking the very foundations of the State.

What would Britain do if the French government was actively funding a British NGO that sought to eliminate the monarchy? What would the United States do if the Iranian government was funding American NGOs pressing for a withdrawal of US forces from the Middle East?

There is a vigorous public debate in Israel, including within the Likud party, over the best means to address the problem of foreign government funding of local NGOs. Proposals range from launching a parliamentary investigation to laws banning or restricting such funding to measures to ensure full transparency. Far from being a sign of Israel's slide toward fascism, the current debate in Israel is a testament to how vibrant our democracy truly is.

Finally, contrary to the implication of your correspondent, Prime Minister Netanyahu has publicly and forcefully condemned the racist sentiments that were mentioned in the article. For example, this is what the Prime Minister said at the opening of Israel's annual Bible Quiz to an audience of mostly observant Jews a few hours after he learned of the letter calling on Jews not to rent apartments to Arabs:

There are non-Jews among the citizens of this country. How would we feel if someone said not to sell apartments to Jews? We would have been outraged, and indeed we are outraged when we hear such things in neighboring countries or anywhere else. Such statements should not be made, neither about Jews nor about Arabs. They must not be made in any democratic country, let alone a Jewish-democratic country that respects the moral values of the Jewish heritage and the Bible. Therefore, the State of Israel categorically rejects these things.

Contrast this unequivocal condemnation by the leader of Israel to the Palestinian Authority law that mandates the death penalty for any one who sells land to Jews. Such laws are all too common in a Middle East in which Christians are persecuted, gays are hanged in public squares and women are stoned for adultery.

In Israel, things are different. Here, we protect the rights of women, gays and minorities, including the 20% of Israelis who are Arabs, who enjoy freedom of speech and religion and the protections afforded by independent courts and the rule of law.

Every decision in Israel is put under the microscope by one of world's largest foreign press contingents, the hundreds of human rights organizations and NGOs that operate freely here, a famously adversarial local press and most critically, by a vociferous parliamentary opposition.

Israel has upheld its democratic values despite being threatened like no country on earth. In defending itself against wars of aggression, unparalleled terror campaigns and continuous promises to annihilate it, Israel has a track record on the protection of rights that would compare favorably to the record of any democracy, much less democracies under threat.

Even in peacetime, other democracies enact laws that would be inconceivable in Israel. The Swiss ban on minarets and the French restrictions on headscarves passed in Europe, not Israel.

One final point regarding media coverage in the Middle East. In 2000, after an Italian television station (RAI) was threatened by the Palestinian Authority for broadcasting the film of a Palestinian mob lynching two Israeli soldiers, RAI issued a shameful apology. Similarly, in 2003, CNN admitted to burying negative coverage about Sadaam's regime so that its personnel could continue working safely in Baghdad.

I can assure you that no matter how biased and unbalanced your correspondents' coverage of Israel, they will always be free here to write whatever they want. Of course, Time is also free not to print it.


Ron Dermer
Senior Advisor to the Prime Minister
.

Labels: ,

January 18, 2011

Daily Mail joins the boycott ?

[ Click Image to Enlarge ]
Imagine a travel ad for the pyramids and sphinx and Nile cruise, without the word Egypt or Egyptian ever appearing? Or one for the Taj Mahal without mentioning the name India, the Eiffel Tower and Notre Dame without France or the Acropolis without Greece?


Witness this ad in today's Daily Mail, promoting a multi-point tour of Jerusalem, Galilee and the Dead Sea, with stops in Caesarea, Acre and Judea.

8 days with so much to see in a country barely the size of Wales.

But which country is it?

The “I” word never appears.

A clear case of blatant de-legitimisation of the Jewish state … as if it doesn’t exist. In or out of the so-called ‘green line’, 1967 or 1948 borders … nada!

At worst this is amounts to pure racism by the UK’s second largest daily newspaper with a circulation 3 times larger than the Times. At best, the Mail has put itself firmly in the boycott business.

It’s utterly scandalous.
.

Labels: ,

January 12, 2011

Fox gives Dupnick a 'D'

The entire US media seems to be engaged in the ‘politicisation’ of last week’s shooting of Arizona Congresswoman Gaby Giffords in which 6 others lost their lives. Whilst this was clearly the act of a mentally deranged gunman, the New York Times leads the charge in blaming all of this on ‘incitement’ by the Tea Party and its supporters on the Right.


But let’s not forget that the FIRST person to politicise this tragedy was the county sheriff, Clarence Dupnik. His job is supposed to be to secure the crime scene and gather whatever evidence is necessary to assist in the eventual conviction of the deranged shooter. Instead, he has not stopped abusing his position at each and every press conference and TV interview to mouth off his liberal left-wing prejudices.

How Freudian therefore that Fox News Channel captioned this errant lawman as (D) – Democrat - on today’s O’Reilly show.

Dupnik disgraces the victims of this tragedy and should be fired.

.

Labels: ,

January 10, 2011

Merkel gets it ... when will Cameron?

This comes from a website called SunniOnline ...

Chancellor Angela Merkel said that Germans have failed to grasp how Muslim immigration has transformed their country and will have to come to terms with more mosques than churches throughout the countryside, according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily.


“Our country is going to carry on changing, and integration is also a task for the society taking up the task of dealing with immigrants,” Ms. Merkel told the daily newspaper. “For years we’ve been deceiving ourselves about this. Mosques, for example, are going to be a more prominent part of our cities than they were before.”

Germany, with a population of 4-5 million Muslims, has been divided in recent weeks by a debate over remarks by the Bundesbank’s Thilo Sarrazin, who argued Turkish and Arab immigrants were failing to integrate and were swamping Germany with a higher birth rate.

The Chancellor’s remarks represent the first official acknowledgement that Germany, like other European countries, is destined to become a stronghold of Islam. She has admitted that the country will soon become a stronghold.

In France, 30% of children age 20 years and below are Muslims. The ratio in Paris and Marseille has soared to 45%. In southern France, there are more mosques than churches.

The situation within the United Kingdom is not much different. In the last 30 years, the Muslim population there has climbed from 82,000 to 2.5 million. Presently, there are over 1000 mosques throughout Great Britain – – many of which were converted from churches.

In Belgium, 50% of the newborns are Muslims and reportedly its Islamic population hovers around 25%. A similar statistic holds true for The Netherlands.

It’s the same story in Russia where one in five inhabitants is a Muslim.
Muammar Gaddafi recently stated that “There are signs that Allah will grant victory to Islam in Europe without sword, without gun, without conquest. We don’t need terrorists; we don’t need homicide bombers. The 50 plus million Muslims (in Europe) will turn it into the Muslim Continent within a few decades.”

The numbers support him.


See my 2006 posting: The Inkblot Test ... HERE

.
.

Labels: ,

January 09, 2011

UK Threat Level - Cause and Effect

The British Security Agency MI-5 has raised the terror threat level to SEVERE following credible intelligence about plots against UK airports and other mass transit centres from Islamist networks.

This undercover exposé by Channel 4's Dispatches programme was aired a couple of years ago. There is little sign the Government - under two prime ministers - has taken any notice in all that time.

Is it any wonder the threat level is now severe?

Is not the prime duty of any government to protect its citizens?

And is prevention not better than cure?

 

Link: Undercover mosque

Labels:

January 08, 2011

Media Priorities

This was emailed to me by an American ...

Lindsay Lohan, 24, gets her name and face all over the news because she went to jail.
Now she's getting it all over again for failing her drug test.
But, nothing in the media about these guys because no one seems to care:

Justin Allen, 23,
Brett Linley, 29,
Matthew Weikert, 29,
Justus Bartett, 27,
Dave Santos, 21,
Chase Stanley, 21,
Jesse Reed, 26,
Matthew Johnson, 21,
Zachary Fisher, 24,
Brandon King, 23,
Christopher Goeke, 23,
Sheldon Tate, 27,

All are Marines who gave their lives for YOU this week.

Labels:

Add to Technorati Favorites Tweets by @ZalmiU